The Death of Small Branches?
Over the past few weeks we’ve been hearing of a number of the national chains closing small branches. In some instances these branches were set up to service specific customers, in other instances they are small branches in small towns, and in some cases they are small branches where there was never a plan to grow (possibly due to personnel, sometimes due to resources, others times due to no plan). A number of these branches experienced expense cut-backs last year.
In a continued effort to ensure every branch is profitable, these companies are facing the question “how small can a small branch be?” and “does a small branch have a role in the industry?”
While it is an admirable goal for every location to be profitable, sometimes markets change thereby dictating that strategies need to change. In other instances an account needs to be serviced in a small locale with a dedicated branch to retain the entire account. And in other scenarios, a small area can be serviced with an alternative product delivery system (from another location, via UPS, via lockboxes, etc).
This also represents an opportunity for independent distributors who may already be servicing these areas. National chains, sometimes beholden to public shareholders, need to make short-term, profit-driven, decisions. Independents can view opportunities with an eye to the longer-term future (presuming they have the cash and cash flow) to service an area or an account.
Are you seeing small branches close in your market? How should a small branch be evaluated? Be supported? Do all branches need to be profitable? Are small branches destined to be a casualty of the recession? Let us know your thoughts.