The Trade Service Effect on your Business.
On June 4th Trimble announced the purchase of Trade Service Corporation.
To some this announcement will be just another time that TSC has changed hands. But there is more to this purchase than many realize. This is a major business focus for Trade Service.
Product Data drives the electrical market place!
Since the start of the business computer age to date, content (Descriptions, Unit of Measures, prices and some sort numbering schema) have created different issues for electrical manufacturers, distributors and the end users). There has always been mis-matches of data that kept the Electrical Channel from passing data along electronically without human intervention.
ERP Development
Both manufacturers and distributors would buy into the development of ERP software systems as a way to run their businesses. But there were two sets of data that didn’t match. One set of data from the manufacturer and another from Trade Service Corp. From the very beginning of the business computer age Trade Service gathered and ‘standardized’ electrical product data to be sold in a book form and eventually as initial loads to a distributor to fill up the ‘buckets (fields) of data”. Distributors were grateful they they didn’t have to develop the product descriptions and benchmark pricing. But there was an underlying confusion. As manufacturers changed their prices, distributors received monthly and eventually weekly electronic price updates. Many of the specific SKU’s didn’t match along with velocity coding.
Different ways to sell product (The rise of the SPA)
Manufacturers looked for ways enhance their margins by issuing Special Pricing Authorizations (SPA) that required the distributor to claim back the difference between sale price and the cost that the distributor paid for the product. Almost without recognizing that the manufacturer had caused the distributor to ‘loan’ them money in the form of a SPA, many came to understand that some manufacturers were depending on many distributors NOT claiming back their SPA money.
Distributors trusted Trade Services’ data and their format. The basic problem was that manufacturers had different data formats, which meant that each distributor had to claim in different formats. Some with paper others with spreadsheets. Even then the data didn’t match completely.
Trade Service walks on the other side of the street to sell contractor data
During the rise of ERP systems, professional contractors were buying computer estimating systems from companies like McCormick Systems, Accubid, Con-Est and Estimation to name a few. Trade Service sold and/or gave away the data loads in estimating systems to develop subscription purchasing models just as they had in the distribution market place. Some jealousy developed between contractor estimating systems because Trade Service had a subscription business model and the estimating systems didn’t
Data didn’t match…..problems grew to a head
Distributors tried to submit their SPA claims in an electronic format and it didn’t match the manufacturers data. Up to this point most distributors submitted piles of paper that eventually evolved to Excel spread sheets. To this day some distributors still submit paper and or Excel spreadsheets. The time to receive the credit for paper and some Excel SPA submissions took as long as 6-9 months. Many distributors never got their money back.
NEMA + NAED = IDEA…….Maybe
NEMA and NAED created IDEA and set about to do some meaningful research that if the product data matched, electronic processes for SPA claiming could be done by both parties using exception reports management. They exchanged data and found a number of errors. but they also developed a number of possibilities for manufacturers and distributors to seamlessly transact business using their computer systems.
NEMA and NAED started IDEA to replace Trade Service data, mistakenly thinking that all distributors would migrate to IDEA data. That didn’t happen! Trade Service continued to dominate the distributor market place. At one point, NAED (NEMA and IDEA) had an agreement to buy Trade Service but internal politics blew that sale away. The possibility of mass conversions to IDEA were blown away and ineffiencies remain even today.
IDEA continued to be plagued with what became known as “distributors don’t trust manufacturers” and kept asking what did IDEA do for them as distributors. Recently IDEA has developed a data schema and has began to encourage manufacturers to load their data into the IDW.
INTERNET evolves
Some distributors looked to their brick and mortar locations the only place to perform business. Other distributors recognized that the Internet would be a low cost store front, but they needed searchable data and pictures of the product.
Most distributors could see the need and the market. Many turned to Trade Service or IDEA for their attributed data needs, while others built their own data. Grainger and Automation Direct addressed the data problems and grew their Internet markets.
MOVING FORWARD
Trade Service has been sold to a company that will push their data through their estimating software systems and now compete against other contractor software companies.
With the sale of Trade Service to Trimble, distributors have to question the support and accuracy of Trade Service data as well as the motivations of Trimble due to its ownership of a contractor estimating system. And other estimating systems will decide if they want to financially support a competitor.
There has always been a lot of money to be made by distributors by the way they handle their SPA’s and sales to their existing customers. but that could change if wrong business decisions are made.
How will the sale of Trade Service to contractor estimating software company affect you business as distributor? Do you think that Trade Service will pay less attention to the distributor end of their business?
Will you have to build your own data?
Or will you get your from IDEA?
Or will you use some data from IDEA and some from other scources?